TEXAS JOURNAL, Austin, Texas - Bob Ward, Editor
April 18, 1996 lead story:
AISD's Counseling Endorses Homosexuality
Apparently, AISD thinks the schools are not diverse
enough and need more homosexual pupils.
According to Caring, AISD's guidance and counseling
newsletter, the district's diversity program includes advising
pupils who think they may be gay that homosexuality is per-
fectly acceptable and anyone who doesn't agree, for whatev-
er reason including religious objections, is a bigot who dis-
torts the Bible.
This newsletter and other material supporting
homosexuality has reportedly been distributed to district
counselors.
Caring, notes that gay and lesbian youths suffer harass-
ment by peers, sexual abuse, domestic violence, illness, de-
structive behavior, AIDS and other sexually transmitted dis-
eases, substance abuse, prostitution, suicide, isolation, paren-
tal rejection, running away and low self-esteem.
That seems like a lot for a school counselor to take on but
Caring sees counselors in "a unique position to address the
developmental issues and mental health concerns of ho-
mosexually oriented youth and their families." There is no
concern that counselors may not be educated or trained to
address "mental health concerns" of children or that the fam-
ily should consult a professional therapist.
Apparently addressing the kids' "mental health concerns"
does not mean seeing homosexuality as a problem and help-
ing the child discover why he or she has those impulses and
then helping him overcome them.
As outlined in Caring it means reinforcing those feelings
by telling him it's okay and that society, his family, the
church and anyone else who disagrees is a bigot who hates
him. For example, counselors are told that gay students
know society says they are "wrong." The quotation marks
tell us that homosexuality isn't really wrong, society is just
bigoted and ignorant.
Counselors are advised to "be aware of the cultural roles
which may affect the students." This includes religious and
moral teachings which are defined as obstacles to a child
"attaining" what is called "a lifestyle of non-concealment."
Contrary to what we're told, the celebrated "wall of sepa-
ration" between church and state does not prevent a public
school from teaching the Bible, provided what is taught is
politically correct.
For example, children may learn in church that the Bible
condemns homosexuality. But AISD's theologians correct
what they consider a doctrinal error. Counselors are in-
formed that "scholars and theologians confer (sic) that refer-
ences to homosexuality in the Bible are questionable at
best." A reading list includes two books about the Bible
(Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism by Bishop John
Spong and What the Bible Really Says About
Homosexuality by Daniel Helminiak) but not the Bible it-
self.
Parents are treated as contemptuously as religion. Guide-
lines admonish counselors to "respect confidentiality" and
not snitch to parents. They are asked to "Imagine . . . the
boy who's (sic) parents withhold affection because they fear
it may make him effeminate."
They're advised to warn pupils about confiding in parents
because they "will probably respond based on a lifetime of
information from a homophobic society." Because parents
financially support their children, pupils are warned not to
tell parents they're gay "until they do not have this weapon to
hold over you."
Alternatives to parents are listed. They include: AIDS Ser-
vices of Austin, a tax-supported agency whose publications
feature salacious pictures and gratuitous crudity of language;
Out Youth Austin, a homosexual group that advertises in
Austin school papers with a hotline kids can call to avoid in-
volving parents; and "self-identified affirming counselors"
on campus.
Most people consider heterosexuality normal, like having
two ears, and not something that needs explaining. AISD
rejects that claiming only about half the population is hetero-
sexual. And a "Heterosexual Questionnaire" asks such ques-
tions as: "What do you think caused your heterosexuality?"
and "When and how did you first decide you were a hetero-
sexual?" The point is that heterosexuality is not the normal
state.
Accordingly, the right to marry is labeled an unwarranted
privilege enjoyed by heterosexuals and unjustly denied to
gays. Counselors are told their own attitudes must conform
to "current scientific knowledge" which considers homo-
sexuality "a normal variation of sexual expression."
To advance the notion that homosexuality is normal
teachers are told to use same sex couples in math word
problems and to problems and to develop "gay history"
curricula.
Schools are admonished to halt such "inappropriate"
practices as inviting "spouses" but not "friends" and encour-
aging students to date members of the opposite sex. Assem-
blies and film nights with homo- sexual content are recom-
mended.
"All students," counselors are told need "skills for declining
or accepting romantic/sexual overtures with dignity."
Parents can be grateful the public schools will teach their
kids to swing either way -- with dignity.